Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru SMP dalam Penulisan Karya Ilmiah
Keywords:
Scientific Writing, Teacher Professional, Development, Community Service, Training Effectiveness, Junior High School TeachersAbstract
This community service activity aimed to improve junior high school
teachers’ competence in scientific writing. The background of this program
was the low percentage of teachers who had experience in writing scientific
papers, where only 30% had previously written academic work. The training
involved 30 teachers from SMP Negeri 2 Pringsewu and was conducted
through theoretical sessions, practical workshops, mentoring, and evaluation
stages. Data were collected using pre-test and post-test instruments,
observation, and participant feedback questionnaires. The results showed a
significant improvement in participants’ understanding and writing skills,
with an average increase of 40%. In addition, 83% of participants
successfully completed draft scientific papers that met academic standards.
The activity also increased teachers’ motivation to write, as indicated by
90% positive responses in the evaluation questionnaire. Therefore, scientific
writing training combined with mentoring proved effective in strengthening
teachers’ professional competence and promoting a culture of academic
writing in schools.
References
[1] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
[2] A. Wibowo, Menulis karya ilmiah: Artikel, skripsi, tesis, dan disertasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.
[3] Supardi, Penelitian tindakan kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2013.
[4] S. Arikunto, Prosedur penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
[5] J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2014.
[6] Depdiknas, Panduan penulisan karya ilmiah. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, 2008.
[7] Sugiyono, Metode penelitian kuantitatif,kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
[8] L. M. Desimone and K. Pak, ―Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development, Teory Into Practice, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947.
[9] M. A. Kraft, D. Blazar, and D. Hogan, ―The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence,‖ Review of Educational Research, vol. 88,
no. 4, pp. 547–588, 2018, doi: 10.3102/0034654318759268.
[10] J. Gore, A. Lloyd, M. Smith, J. Bowe, H. Ellis, and D. Lubans, ―Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds,‖ Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 67, pp. 1–13, 2017, doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.010.
[11] M. R. Heydari, F. Taghva, M. Amini, and S. Delavari, ―Using Kirkpatrick’s model to measure
the effect of a new teaching and learning methods workshop for health care staff,‖ BMC Research Notes, vol. 12, art. no. 388, 2019, doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4421-y
[12] K. M. Mitchell et al., ―Development and validation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-
Efficacy Scale (SAWSES),‖ Assessing Writing, vol. 48, art. no. 100524, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100524.
[13] M. von Isenburg, L. S. Lee, and M. H. Oermann,-Writing together to get AHEAD: An
interprofessional boot camp to support scholarly writing in the health professions,‖ Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 167–172, 2017, doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.222
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
