AN EVALUATION ON TEFL 1 SYLLABUS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT: A RATIONAL- BASED MODEL
Abstract
Curriculum is the design to carry out a particular language program, including subject-matter objectives, sequencing and materials to meet the needs of a designated group of learners in a defined context (Brown, 2000). The objective of this study is to depict the academic English language curriculum/syllabus of TEFL 1 subject in English Department UM Mataram. The present study analyzes the coherence, consistency, and relevance of the curriculum objectives, content, learning activities, and assessment, institution vision and mission, law, and the nature of the subject matter. Tyler’s rationale model is utilized in analyzing the documents. The result of this study can be used as some considerations in reconstructing the syllabus so that learning experiences will be relevant and consistent with the learning objectives stated in the syllabus.
Â
Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Bogdan, R.C. and Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Brown, J.,D. (1995). The element of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. California: Longman.
Cohen, Louis et al. (2005). Research method in education. London and New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approach. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Gay, L.,R. (1985). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application, New Jersey: Imprint of Prentice Hall
Glatthorn, A. (1987). Curriculum leadership. Illinois: Scott.
Graves, K. ( 2016). Language curriculum design: Possibilities and realities in The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching edited by Hall (2016). New York: Routledge:
Krahnke, K .(1987). Approaches to Syllabus Design for Foreign Language Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
McNeil, J. D. (2006). Contemporary curriculum in thought and action. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
McNeil, K., Newman, I. & Stenhauser, J. (2005). How to be involved in program evaluation. What every administrator need to know. Maryland: Scarecrow
Merriam, S.,B. (1998). Case study research in education. San Fransisco: Josey-Bass.
Oliva, PF (1988). Developing the curriculum (2nd ed.). Boston: Scott, Foresman.
Ornstein, A.,C., & Hunkins, F.,P. (2009). Curriculum: foundations, principles, and issues. Boston; Pearson Education Inc.
Oxford, R.L. (2003). Language Lerarning styles and Strategies: an overview. Oxford: GALA.
Posner, J., G. (1992). Analyzing the curriculum. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Richard , J. C. 2001. Curriculum development in language teaching. United States:Cambridge. University Press
Rodgers, T. (1989). Syllabus design, curriculum development and Policy determination. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Saylor, J.,G., Alexander, W., & Lewis,A.,J. (1981). Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. (2007). Curriculum Development: Theory into Practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Yin, R., K. (2003). Case study research: Designs and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wen Su, S. (2012). The Various concept of Curriculum and the factors involved in Curricula Making. Jornal of English language teaching and Research Vol. 3 No 1.
Worthen, R., & Sanders, R. (1998). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York: Longman.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52657/js.v5i1.788
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.