STRATEGI EKSPLISIT DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PRAGMATIK: KAJIAN LITERATURE RIVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52657/jp.v11i2.3479Keywords:
Explicit-strategies, pragmatic-Instruction, Indonesia-LanguageAbstract
This study aims to explore the effectiveness of explicit strategies in pragmatic instruction through a literature review of eight research articles. Pragmatic competence is a crucial aspect of language mastery that encompasses the ability to understand and use language appropriately in diverse social contexts. The method employed is a literature review by analyzing empirical studies comparing the effectiveness of explicit and implicit strategies in pragmatic instruction. The findings indicate that explicit strategies are consistently more effective in enhancing learners' metapragmatic awareness, speech act production ability, and interpersonal activeness compared to implicit strategies. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of developing pragmatic teaching materials oriented toward explicit strategies by providing metapragmatic explanations, authentic examples, and structured activities to optimize learners' pragmatic competence.
References
Aleb, M., Bensafa, A., & Hamada, H. (2025). The impact of explicit pragmatic instruction on EFL learners' comprehension of indirect speech acts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(1), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1601.13
Ariana, Nasim, Masoumeh Ahmadi Shirazi, & Seyed Mohammad Mousavi
Nadoushani. (2017). An Explicit/Implicit Lead to Producing Requests: Eliciting Learners’ Awareness or Soliciting Metapragmatic Knowledge. Jounal Ijalel, 6 (1), 115-127.
Chong-yuan, Z. (2021). Explicit speech act instruction for developing EFL students’ pragmatic competence. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(4), 26-35.
Ekin, Mehzudil Tuğba Yıldız. (2013). Do current EFL Coursebooks Work for
the Development of L2 Pragmatic Competence? The Case of suggestions. Journal Procedia Social and Behaviour Sciences, 93, 1306-1310.
Enyi, Amaechi Uneke &Chiekpezie Edwin Orji. (2019). Interlanguage
Pragmatics and the Teaching of English in Nigeria’s L2 Classrooms. Journal Ijalel, 8 (4), 19-25.
Fathi, M. J., Kafipour, R., Kashefian-Naeeini, S., & Shahsavar, Z. (2025). The impact of reflective teaching on EFL learners through implicit and explicit pragmatic competence instructions. Reflective Practice, 26(2), 292-310.
Fukuya, Yoshinori J. (2008). The Interactive Effects of Pragmatic-Eliciting
Tasks and Pragmatic Instruction. Journal FALL (Foreign Language Annals), 4 (3), 478-500.
Hapsari, A. (2013). The Role Of Explicit Pragmatic Instruction To Improve Second Language Learners’ Ideational Metafunction Of The Target Language. Journal of English and Education (JEE), 7(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v7i2.4473
Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T. (2008). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis. In Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165-211). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.13.10jeo
Nguyen, T. T. M., Pham, T. H., & Pham, M. T. (2012). The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of pragmatics, 44(4), 416-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003
Pratiwi, V. U., & Rohmadi, M. (2021). Pragmatic approach to Indonesian speaking skills for student vocational high schools. International journal of linguistics, literature and culture, 7(4), 263-273.
Qi, Xuedan & Chun Lai. (2017). The Effects of Deductive Instruction and
Inductive Instructionon Learners’ Development of Pragmatic Competence in The Teaching of Chinese as A Second Language. Journal Elsevier: System, 70, 26 37.
Shirazi, & Seyed Mohammad Mousavi
Nadoushani. (2017). An Explicit/Implicit Lead to Producing Requests: Eliciting Learners’ Awareness or Soliciting Metapragmatic Knowledge. Jounal Ijalel, 6 (1), 115-127.
Sugiyono (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000084
Takahashi, S. (2010). The effect of pragmatic instruction on speech act performance. In A. Martínez-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 127-143). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26.08tak
Takimoto, Masahiro. (2020). Investigating The Effects of Cognitive Linguistic
Approach in Developing EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Proficiency. Journal Pre-Proof: System, Sys102233.
Trifita, H. (2020). The effects of implicit versus explicit instructions to teach refusal strategies on students’ sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic competence. (2020). English journal of indragiri, 4(1), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.32520/eji.v4i1.864
Ziafar, M. (2020). The influence of explicit, implicit, and contrastive lexical approaches on pragmatic competence: The case of Iranian EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(1), 103-131.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Izhar Izhar, Seftika Seftika, Kurniati Kurniati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
